The time was fall of 1970. The place was Ann Arbor, Michigan, in the northern United States. I was eighteen years old. Ann Arbor is a college town. The feeling of excitement was in the air. Woodstock happened, on August 18, 1969. The Vietnam War was at its peak. The catch-phrase of the day was tune in, turn on, and drop out. That is pretty much what we did. Collectively, the youth thought we had a better way. We certainly were not in tune with what was happening in Vietnam. We were hippies and proud of it. The war affirmed our anti-establishment stance.
Timothy Leary became sort of a spokesman for my generation. Psychedelic drugs appeared for the first time. He called them mind expanding. We believed him. Earlier that year, I had tried one at a party. The term mind blowing is not an exaggeration. This was not subtle, like alcohol. On the contrary, it was visual. After about a hour hallucinations started to appear. Reality began to split and multiply. As it did, my environment became more complicated. As it became more complicated, the hallucinations multiplied in number. There was no way out. Then, all of a sudden, I had this idea. From chaos came clarity. I wanted to write the idea down but I didn't have a pencil and paper. I remember thinking, in my mind, that I couldn't get back to where I was before. Not physically but mentally. As soon as I had the idea, it was gone. That was about three months prior. I learned something important but I didn't remember what it was.
It isn't easy to stay focused on work when you are eighteen and these drugs are in the environment. Mind altering experiences like this make it seem whatever you are doing is a lot less important. School, jobs, and life's necessities didn't seem that important. That isn't good. At eighteen you need to compete for your place in society. Instead I did the opposite. I tuned in, turned on, and dropped out. A lot of us did.
Fall in Michigan can be beautiful. Fall is a period during the year when the days shorten but are still warm. The leaves on the trees turn yellow, red, and orange. The mosquitos are gone. Fall is that brief period where the weather is really good. Students return to class. The impending winter makes fall seem all the sweeter.
It was during this time when the party happened. It was one of those parties that turned into the party of the year. Everything just fell into place. Someone was able to rent an apartment for the evening. I don't even think it had furniture. The mix of people was just right, not too many and not too few. There was a mix of friends and strangers. It was one of those magical nights when everything just worked out perfectly.
We were college age in a college town. Tune in was the catch phrase of the day. Anyone aware of the college atmosphere in the 1970s knows what I'm talking about. The culture of hippies, Woodstock, and peace was in full bloom. Someone, I don't remember who, had purchases a cache of drugs for the party. Most of us took one. This was not anything unusual for my culture in 1970. The party was late teens and early twenty year olds coming together to get high with each other for one special evening.
The party was free of parental supervision. As the party began no one felt anything extraordinary. It was just young people sitting in an apartment talking in small groups. As the party got going, and the drug took effect, I remember thinking to myself how loud the conversations were. As the party developed, and the drug took hold on the group, there was feeling of love that engulfed the group. The closeness everyone felt was hard to describe. There was no shyness. There was no searching for conversation. On the contrary, people were emoting loudly in little groups. You could feel the closeness. It was palpable.
Unlike the first time I had taken a mind altering drug, this was far more subdued. Most people didn't feel anything unusual except the heightened closeness with others in the room. What I noticed is that the conversations became more vivid and intense. Not necessarily louder in terms of volume. They were louder in terms of the attention they demanded. They seemed more insistent on being heard, if you will.
I was always a problem solver. I wondered what was causing this heightened conversation effect. As the night went on, I began to realize that I was hearing more than I normally would. Whereas before while sober, I would hear one conversation. Now there we times where I was hearing more than one conversation. The sensation isn't what you think. It wasn't as though it was anything useful, like playing piano (with both hands). It was confusion. The manifestation of hearing more than one conversation was an increase of confusion. It was not pleasant.
Out of this crucible of confusion came the first theory, Proof of Afterlife By Awareness. What I experienced, while high, was that during life we listen to far less than what I was experiencing now. That experience opened me up to the idea that awareness doesn't end at death. In fact it does the opposite. Awareness gets enhanced. It goes up.
I remember sitting in the room, watching everyone had pared off into small groups. Within each small group was a conversation of intense interest. The people in the group were in rapt attention with their group members. There may have been ten or more groups in the room. I was struck with the thought that there are ten conversations in the environment, yet we hear only one. It was abundantly clear there is far more going on in the room than we are actively aware of.
What I say that evening was a key. The key was my mind in confusion. Normally, when in a room full of conversations, you tune into one and tune the others out. You are relaxed, controlled, and at ease. That evening I had no ability to tune the other conversations out. They were all equally important. The result was confusion. I was not relaxed, controlled, nor at ease.
To most people that evening the heightened awareness they experienced meant nothing. They were in party mode. Heightened awareness was no big deal. But to me it was a big deal. This seemingly insignificant opening of awareness held the key to the afterlife. It proved afterlife. Now, fifty years later, I will show you exactly how heightened awareness proves afterlife. Here is the first proof, Proof of Afterlife By Awareness.
Awareness, within the context of this discussion, is the ability to perceive, to feel, and be conscious. Awareness is the state or quality of being aware of something. Awareness is being alive. Awareness is our perception and cognitive reaction to objects, conditions or events in our environment. It is being aware of our surrounding environment. It is our focus. It is our consciousness. It is that portion of what is going on around us of which we are consciously aware. It is what our conscious mind focuses on. Someone is aware when they focus on what is happening around them.
Awareness is being alive and mindful of what is going on in your surroundings.
Let's say you are sitting at your desk at work. It is 10:00 in the morning. As you are sitting in your cubical a friend walks by and says Hi. You look up and smile. A minute later a bird flies past your window. You catch a glimpse of it as it passes. Then your phone rings. As you reach over to pickup the phone you inadvertently knock your cup of coffee over on your desk, spilling coffee all over your papers. When you draw this up on a time line it looks like this:
The period of time from 10:00 to 10:04 was rather hectic. Looking back on it we have a tendency to think that everything happened at once. In our minds, we think that we got hit with four things at once.
However when you draw it out on a time line you can see that four things did not happen at once. They happened over time sequentially. At 10:00 you are sitting at your desk. Someone walks by and says hi. Your attention (shown as a black dot) shifts from whatever you are doing to the person. At 10:01 when the bird flies by your attention shifts from the person to the bird outside. Then it shifts again. Finally it shifts again to the spilled coffee on the desk.
Because awareness is sequential, we tend to overestimate what we are aware of. What feels like four things happening at once is really four individual things happening over time.
During any given moment there is just one thing we pay attention to. Hence, our awareness behaves as a focal point within the environment. This is shown above as the black dot above shifting focus in the environment over time. It darts around from one thing to another thing continuously. We tend to focus exclusively on the one thing we deem important at the moment. Then focus shifts as our attention gets preempted by something more important. We think we have paid attention to all four things simultaneously. However we really focused on just one thing at a time.
To illustrate how awareness works in the environment imagine yourself at a party. Here is my diagram of what the party might look like:
Imagine twenty people in a fairly small room like this. People are formed into small groups as shown above. Inside each group is a conversation as represented by the red circle surrounding each group.. People are standing around, affiliated with their group, listening and commenting on the current conversational topic of the group. Each group maintains its own unique line of thought.
We walk around the party alone, not affiliated with any particular group. When we join a group our awareness focuses on the conversation of the group. We listen to the conversation of our group, focus on it exclusively, and tune out all the other conversations going on simultaneously in the groups around the room.
A diagram of the party from above looks like this:
Here is how the party is represented in the diagram:
1. The blue dots represent people at the party.
2. The red circles represent the conversations of the various groups of people at the party.
3. The lighter green circles represent the range of the sound (noise) generated by the conversations of the groups.
When we join a group (shown as a blue dot within a red circle) we listen to the conversation of our group. However, the sound of our group's conversion (as represented by the shaded green circle) extends physically beyond our group. The sound of conversation (light green circle) is much larger than the group (red circle).
Our ability to listen to the conversation in our group (and tune out all the other conversations in the room) is not based on proximity. Nor is it based on sound volume. The conversation we pay attention to is based on awareness.
We are aware of (tuned in to) the conversation in our group because we choose to focus on that conversation. At the same time we choose NOT to be aware of (ignore) all other conversations. Other conversations become background noise. We tune them out. Of all the conversations in the room, we listen to only one; our immediate group's conversation.
The other conversations are relegated to background noise. They may be just as loud as the conversation we are listening to, but we choose not to listen. We can hear other conversations (as shown by the overlapping green circles) but we do not listen to them. At some spots in the room we hear three or more conversations. Yet we choose to listen to the one we are in. Our conscious awareness stays with one conversation only, usually the one we are actively engaged in.
We could, if we wanted to, tune out (ignore) our group's conversion and tune into a conversation across the room. Here is how that works:
1. Imagine being in a group listening to its conversation.
2. Then, all of a sudden, you unintentionally catch an interesting piece of gossip in the group next to you.
3. You are really interested in this gossip so you tune out (ignore) the group you are in and tune into the group next to you.
4. You hear the tasty piece of gossip from the distant group. You listen exclusively to what they are saying for a little while.
5. Then someone in your group asks you a question and your attention comes back to the group you are in.
There is nothing to stop us from doing this. Attention shift happens all the time. All we have to do is to shift our awareness from our group to another group and follow their line of thought. We do not need to move physically. All we need to do is change our focus. When our awareness is in another group's conversation we will lose the line of thought in our own group's conversation. While your attention is with the other group, our group's conversation becomes background noise.
A change in conversational focus looks like this:
The woman in the back right of the room is interested in the man on the far left. She quits paying attention to the conversation of her immediate group and focuses her attention on the man's group across the room. Now she listens to their conversation. Consequently she tunes out both her conversation and the conversation in the middle of the room.
She can do this because focus is based on attention, not proximity or volume. While a shift in focus like this is possible, ignoring the people in your group is not good manners. So as soon as someone in her group speaks to her directly her focus will quickly return to her group and pick up the thread of the conversation we she left off.
It is important to realize that her focus can be in her group or it can be across the room but it cannot be in both places at exactly the same time.
We can simulate focus in two places in the room by darting back and forth between conversations. Shifting focus like this is like the worker, bird, phone, coffee analogy above. What appears to happen simultaneously actually happened over time. Our attention may dart between groups quickly, but at any one moment our focus is with just one group's conversation.
Singularity of focus is a fundamental concept of awareness. If we consider the party room as a whole, with all its groups and conversations, we are aware of only the conversation we are currently listening to. The conversation we listen to is a subset of all conversations going on at the moment. We can show the relationship between all conversations in the room versus the one we are paying attention to like this:
The left side of the diagram shows all the conversations going on in the room that are loud enough to hear, but have chosen to ignore. The right side of the diagram shows the one conversation we are paying attention to currently. There is a one (conversation we actively listen to) to many (all comversions in the room) relationship going on.
The conversations in the room are represented as arrows coming at us. The arrows are the incoming stimulus hitting our ears competing for our attention. Of all these conversations, one conversation has our attention. It is the conversation shown in red. This is the one conversation we are actively listening to. It is the one we currently aware of. The other conversations are relegated to the background. We consider them background noise. While we hear them, we do not pay attention to them. Viewed visually awareness looks like this:
So here is what we have:
1. On the left side, we have the total environment represented by all the conversations in the room.
2. On the right side, we have the one conversation we are currently engaged in and listening to.
In conclusion, we are not aware of all the conversations around us at any one time. The sequential nature of awareness (darting about the environment over time) leads us to believe we are aware of more conversations than we actually are. As the party analogy shows, at any one moment in time, we are aware of just one conversation. This is but a small portion of all the conversations we hear.
To understanding awareness look at just one moment in time. Awareness moves around quickly. It can dart around from thing to thing in the environment. Because awareness moves around quickly we tend to think that it is in two places at once. What is really happening is that awareness concentrates on one thing, then moves quickly to another, and the back to the original thing. This makes awareness seem as though it is in two places at once. It makes it appear bigger than it actually is.
For a clearer view of awareness we have to narrow our frame of reference down to one moment in time. In a geometric sense this is just one slice of time. When you look at the single moment in time, you eliminate everything outside that moment. What happens just before and just after that moment is out of the picture.
Listening to two conversations at the same moment is entirely different than darting between two conversations over time. Listening to two conversations at the same time would feel like having two people shouting at you, each demanding your undivided attention. It would feel like each person yelling into each ear. It would be beyond annoying. It would be hopelessly complicated. It would be completely intolerable. Awareness is not set up to be in two places at the same time. When it is, caios ensues.
When we walk into a room, our awareness darts about looking at the floor, the walls, and the people. By moving our focus throughout the environment, we quickly gain an understanding of what is going on. However in any one moment, we are focused on just one aspect. A fundamental quality of awareness is singularity of focus within a moment of time.
At the party we are listening to one conversation while 12 other conversations are going on at the same time. Those ignored conversations are considered background noise.
The illustration below shows the conversations in the room as arrows approaching our consciousness. The heavy black vertical line represents the current moment. The black line represents conversations are reaching our ears. We hear all of them all. We know we hear them because all we need to do is stop a moment, change our focus to any one of them, and will be able to listen to the conversational thread. Their sound is reaching our ear drums.
Of all these conversations, we focus on just one. That is the conversation shown in red. That is the one conversation able to get through to our conscious. It alone has our attention. All others are tuned out. We hear them, but we don't listen to them. Visually that looks like this:
When represented as a diagram like this, it becomes clear there is much more going on in the environment than we are aware of. We actively listen to one conversational thread. Meanwhile the other conversational threads that are hitting our ear drums are relegated to the background.
Imagine going back in time to relive this exact same moment. The second time you experience the moment however, you change your focus to a different conversation. This time you have is the exact same environment, with awareness focused on a different conversation. The first time we experienced the moment we were listening to conversation A. The second time we were listening to conversation B. The two environments were identical. The only difference is what we were aware of within the moment.
Whether we were listening to conversation A, or conversation B, is a matter of choice. It points out that there is more going on in the environment than we are aware of. This becomes especially clear when you look at one moment in time. The next step is to examine the ratio between awareness and the environment. Awareness is less than the environment, that much we know. How much less needs to be determined. Are we aware of half our environment? Are we aware of one quarter of our environment? What is the mathematical relationship between our awareness and our environment?
To solve the ratio of awareness (what we are aware of) versus the surrounding environment, we have to theoretically open awareness within the environment. Until now we have looked at being aware of just one conversation in the room. In the illustration below, we open awareness slightly, so we are aware of three conversations. That looks like this:
The illustration shows three conversations getting through to awareness simultaneously, instead of just one. Three simultaneous conversations are shown as three arrows in red on the left. Normally just one conversation gets through. We listen to just one at a time. Now, instead of listening to one conversation, we are actively listening to three as shown by the groups on the right.
What would listening to three conversations at one time feel like? We have no frame of reference because this never happens. However we can speculate based on a few assumptions:
1. You can eliminate any jumping back and forth between groups because this takes time. We are talking about a moment in time.
2. Each conversation would be attacking our conscious mind with the same intent and focus as we previously had with just one. Rather than listening to one and hearing three, we are talking about listening actively to all three simultaneously.
3. If asked to take an exam on the subject matter of each conversational thread we could pass it.
The result of listening to three conversations would be complicated, chaotic and confusing. It would be as though three different groups were shouting at you demanding to be heard exclusively. Without the ability to hold back the other two conversations, we would decend into madness within seconds.
In the thought experiment above we opened our awareness from one conversation to three. As a result we were plunged into chaos and confusion. Opening awareness even this tiny amount resulted in a drowning of stimulous. Undaunted however, we are going to open awareness still further. We are going to force awareness to accept (be aware of) even more of the environment.
Imagine opening awareness from three conversations to six. Now we have six arrows in red. Imagine opening awareness up still further. Imagine being able to actively listen to and fully understand every conversion in the room all at once. Imagine how confusing that would be.
Continuing this trend, imagine opening awareness up still further and pushing it to its upper limit. We are going to throw open the doors of awareness and let everything in. This gives rise to the following question: >
What is the upper limit of awareness? The answer is, the upper limit of awareness is the environment.
The thought experiments we have done with awareness and the environment have been within one moment in time. Now we are going to examine awareness with respect to time. The red arrow below shows the moment we are in now. We can call it 12:00 noon. The moments shown in gray are the moments in the past. These are moments you just experienced. You were in them a moment ago. They lead up to the present, however you are not in them now. You exist only the current moment. Shown in the diagram below, only the current moment is able to get through to awareness. The moments of the past are blocked from awareness as shown here:
The illustration above, awareness in time, looks like the conversations in the room. Awareness operates in time exactly like it operates in the environment. In the environment we are aware of one conversation at a time. In time we are aware of one moment in time. We are not aware of multiple moments of the past. We are aware of the present only. Awareness is focused in the present moment. Awareness is located at one moment at a time.
Exactly like we opened awareness to accept three conversations in space, we are now going to open awareness to accept three moments time. Under our new opened awareness model, instead of being aware just of the present, we are going to be aware of the present and two additional moments of the past. This is what that looks like:
What would it feel like to experience three moments in time simultaneously?
It would be unimaginably confusing to be aware of more than one moment at a time. This is what it would look when your hand passes before your face. It would look like this to experience five moments at once:
The diagram above shows the utter confusion ensuing from being aware of multiple moments simultaneously. Showing awareness expanding in time is even clearer than showing awareness expanding in space. You can see that if had were forced into this five moments reality, your environent would become unbelievealby complicated. Faced with these complications, would decend into madness in seconds.
We know by looking at the illustration above that we could not possibly cope with experiencing multiple moments at once. When we opened awareness from one moment to five we unleashed all kinds of confusion. However, we are going to open awareness in time still further. Imagine what it would be like to experience 10 moments at once. Further, what would it feel like to experience a full five minutes, all at once. This give rise to the question:
What is the upper limit of awareness with respect to time? The answer is all time, every moment you have ever experienced. This includes all moments in time from the time your life began at conception up to, and including, the present.
1. Solving For Awareness In Time
With awareness and space we know the upper limit of awareness is the environment. With awareness and time we know the upper limit of awareness is time. Unlike awareness and space however, with awareness and time we know where awareness is within time. Awareness is in the present. This makes the relationship between awareness and time clear. Expressed as an equation, the ratio between awareness and time looks like this:
On the left side of the equation we have the ratio between awareness and life. Awareness, during life, is in the present. The upper limit of awareness is a lifetime, from conception to now.
On the right side of the equation is their geometric equivalents. On top, we have a moment, a single point in time. This is analgous to the present. On the bottom we have an eternity. An eternity is all time. The replationship between the present (awareness) and a lifetime is exactly the same as their geometic equivalents, a moment in time verses an eternity.
On top of the equation (the numerator) is what awareness is during life. On the bottom of the equation is the upper limits of awareness (the denominator). This represents what awareness could potentially become.
The next step is to solve awareness within space. We are trying to find the geometric relationship between awareness and the surrounding environment. Expressed as an equation our problem looks like this:
The left side of the equation shows the relationship between awareness within the environment. During life awareness is a point of view within the environment.
The right side of the equation shows the geometric equivalents. On top we have a point. This is analgous to conscious awareness. On the bottom we have space. This is analgous to the surrounding environment. The relationship between point of view (awareness) and the environment is exactly the same as their geometric equivalents, a point in space versus all space.
On the top (the numerator) we have what awareness is during life. On the bottom of the equation is the upper lmits of awareness (the denominator). This represents what awareness could eventually become.
Now that we have been through our thought experiments, we are going to solve for awareness in the time/space continuum. To solve this equation we apply the relationship between awareness and time, as well as the relationship between awareness and space.
To express this visually we are going rotate time back to reveal space in a unconventional four dimensional view (length, width, depth, and time). The diagram looks like this:
This diagram shows awareness as a point in time and space. We can envision awareness being located at a specific point in time, and a specific point in space.
Awareness can be thought of as a single point in a time/space continuum.
Awareness in time and space, expressed as an equation, it looks like this:
The left side of the equation shows the relationship between awareness and a lifetime. On top, we have awareness as a point of view with time and space. On the bottom, is all the enviroments of an entire lifetime.
On the top right we have the geometric equivalents. On the top, we have a single point in time and space. It has position ohly. On the bottom, we have a time-space continuum. This is the unlimited length, width, depth, and time surrounding the point.
On the top (the numerator) we have what awareness is during life. On the bottom of the equation is the upper limit of what awareness could become.
You're sitting in a room surrounded by five conversations. You listen to one. You hear the other four. You only paid attention to one. The other four you ignored.
You heard all five conversations. They entered your ears and were absorbed by the mind. Yet you were only aware of one. The question becomes, what happens to the other four?
All five conversations are retained. In the moment, we deemed one relevant and others irrelevant, however all were retained. The information that passes into memory unnoticed far exceeds that which is noticed. The relationship between unnoticed-to-noticed is one to many. Expressed geometrically, it is space-to-point.
Gathering unnoticed information, over a lifetime, represents a huge unrealized potential. You could argue that this huge unrealized potential is discarded at the end of life but you'd be wrong. Everything in life, realized or not, is retained in the mind.
If all is retained, then what happens to this huge unrealized potential? The answer is it is realized in a single moment at the end of life.
Here is a diagram of two boxes. There is a small box and a big box. The center of each box is located at the center of the environment. In other words, both are placed in the environment at location 0,0,0.
The inner box represents conscious awareness. It can be thought of as a point of view. The outer box represents memory.
The centers of both boxes are at the same location, which is the center of the environment. The mental image is to make the inner box smaller, while making the outer box larger. Push the inner box to its smallest possible dimension. That would be a single point at the center of the environment. Push the outer box correspondingly larger. That would be the environment itself. There you have it. The point at the center of the environment is awareness. The environment itself is memory.
The important thing to realise is that the human mind contains iboth boxes. Life is not only conscious awareness at the center. It is awareness surrounded by memory. In terms of untapped potential, during life we are like a tiny minnow. We takes tiny bites of information as we swim through life. Meanwhile, in the background and complete unbeknown to use, memory is like a mega-mouth shark. It scoops up huge amounts of information as it swims through life. Memory's mouth is wide open.
During life we are the minnow. We are also the large shark. We just don't realize it. The massive food eating of the large shark takes place in the background. It goes on unnoticed.
During life the little mind is in control. Awareness is not allowed to expand during life. If it trys, it drowns in confusion. It is confined to position.
At the end of life, when the little mind no longer exists, the big mind still exists. The big mind is our unrealized potential. Basically, it contains everything. The manifestation of the big mind taking over is awareness exploding throughout space.
In the previous section we spoke about the duality of the human mind. On the one hand, it is the focal point at the center of the environment. We call that the little mind. On the other hand, it is the surrounding environment. We call that the big mind. The mind is both, with little mind contained inside the big mind.
There is also a third mind. We have the little mind, the big mind, and the super big mind. The super big mind is time. It works like this.
As we move through life, we experience moments. In the moment we are the little mind. We also are the big mind. Both minds get absorbed into memory.
Hence memory becomes the third mind. We have awareness, contained in the environment. We also have the environment, contained in memory. We have a container, inside a container, inside a container.
In terms of unrealized potential we have awareness represented as a single point in time and space. Then we have the environment, represented as a space within time. Then we have time itself. What we are aware of during life is like a single point of no width, length, depth, or duration. What we are unaware of during life is unlimited width, length, depth, and eternity. It is the smallest possible thing to the largest possible thing. Visually that looks like this:
During life we are the point in the center of our environment, on the leading edge of our time-space continuum. Awareness is shown as the small red dot in the center of space. Awareness is a single location in time-space. It has no length, width, depth, or duration but it exists.
At the moment life ends, the little mind ceases to exist. At this moment the mega mind takes over. This is manifested as awareness exploding throughout time-space. The illustration shows expanding boxes representing awareness expanding outward from its central location. The concentric boxes represent awareness expanding into time-space.
In the drawing, awareness goes from one unit to two units. Then it goes from two units to four. Then it goes from four units to eight. Finally awareness expands out to its fullest extent absorbing all of time-space.
Understanding afterlife requires thinking in geometric terms. Geometrically you have a point in time-space becoming all of time-space. This is the same dimension change that occurred at birth. Afterlife is awareness undergoing a dimensional change to become everything.
Afterlife comes down to unrealized potential. Consider awareness as a location within time-space. Consider time-space as surrounding awareness. Awareness and surrounding time-space how we live life.
During life everything we experience is being filed away in memory. Memory is all inclusive. It contains everything. Absorbing all information into memory and retaining it, as opposed to discarding it, sets up a huge reservoir of untapped potential. That untapped potential is the time-space. It is saved during a lifetime. Memory containing time-space represents afterlife. It is the kingdom of heaven.
Awareness, at the end of life, expands to absorb all information you gathered throughout your lifetime. The moment life ends, awareness goes from a point in time-space to all time-space. Afterlife is as an explosion of awareness throughout time-space. Through afterlife we become everything.
This is physically possible because when the human body stops functioning we are in the presence of everything. Everything is contained within memory. The moment life ends, everything is with us. Memory is all inclusive. All our experiences are with us in memory. Everyone we have ever known is with us in memory. Everything we have ever done, every thought we have ever had, and every emotion felt is with us now. It is with us at the end of life.
Our life will end at a specific point in time-space. When it does however, that one point expands to become all time-space.
Yes, afterlife is only one moment in durantion. But that is from the perspective of an outside observer. The person inside afterlife is experiencing all time-space simultaneously. You can think of it as a moment expanding to become an eternity. You can think of it as a point expanding to become a universe.
For afterlife we only need this single point in time-space. That single moment-point transitions to become everything. Because afterlife is just one moment in duraction it is independent of the physical body. Afterlife is as all moments of life experienced completely, simultaneously, and eternally.
During life we are confined to a location within time and space. In afterlife this turns inside out. In afterlife we become all time and space. As such we become all seeing and knowing. Through death each one of us becomes God.
This concludes Proof Of Afterlife By Awareness
I run a server on the Internet. My server is located at fixed IP address. That means it has a fixed location on the Internet. The IP address does not change, as do most Internet connections. It remains fixed, meaning it is on the same IP address, all the time.
IP addresses are numbers. Every computer on the Internet has one. Each address is unique. Right now there are 999,999,999,999 unique IP addresses that make up the Internet. That is changing because we are running out of them. Soon there will be 999,999,999,999,999,999 Internet Protocol Addresses. There are a lot of computers connected to the Internet.
Every one of these computers can reach my computer. They have direct access, one IP address to another. Unfortunately not all these people have good intentions. Many people are trying to break in for nefarious purposees. Constant exposeure to all these computers is just part of the Internet business. Attacks come nonstop. They come from all directions. Outside computers are constantly probing my computer for a way to get in.
To combat attacks publicly hosted servers use a firewall. A firewall is in separate hardware device. It sits between our server and the Internet at large. Traffic attempting to reach my computer has to go through the firewall first. Then the firewall forwards the traffic to my computer. Here's what it looks like when the firewall malfunctions and allows all of the traffic on the Internet to pass.
A firewall is a defensive measure. Its main function is to close down traffic. The security concept is to close everything first. When your firewall closes all traffic it is like having a computer in space. Then you open only those IP addresses that you want to access your computer. For example I have computers in a data center in downtown Los Angeles. However I work from my house in Santa Ana, about 40 miles away. I have my firewall set to only allow traffic from the IP address at my house. All other traffic is stopped. It is not allowed to go through. This way my working computer can have free open access to my server in Los Angeles while keeping out all other computers on the Internet.
Of all the billions of computers contacting your computer, all traffic except the computer at my house will be ignored. It would not be allowed to get through. I like to think of the computer as a ball. That ball is one hole. That hole is a pinprick. It is one tiny hole. If the traffic doesn't hit that hole it bounces off. It is ignored.
The analogy of a computer with one IP address open, surrounded by billions of connecting computers is a good one for awareness. Awareness during life is firewalled. At any given moment we have a deluge of information coming at us. Awareness will only accept information through one IP only. The vast majority of the information coming at us is blocked from getting through. It goes into the firewall but it never gets through it. It is stopped at the firewall.
This illustrates the difference between awareness and memory. Awareness is like the one computer that is allowed to get through the firewall to contact my computer. Memory is like all the computers at large whose traffic gets stopped at the firewall.
The thing that makes awareness difficult to comprehend is that during life we are behind the firewall. In other words, what we perceive during life to be total awareness is only the one computer interacting with us. Just like that one computer that we perceive, there are billions more out there that we do not perceive. We do not perceive them because they are stopped at the firewall. However, their input is taken into memory. So what feels like full awareness is actually just a tiny, tiny bit of the total incoming traffic being taken into memory.
A firewall during life, just like a firewall on the Internet, is a protective measure. We can be thankful that during life awareness is restricted to the one outside computer only. Keeping awareness restricted this way keeps everything under control. We could open the firewall up and allow more computers to reach it. However, in life and on the Internet, it is not a good idea. Opening the firewall can easily result in an overload of information.
There is a technique on the Internet known as denial of service attack. It is a simple concept. The bad guys instruct thousands of computers to contact the target computer at the same time. It is a coordinated information attack. The goal is to overwhelm the target computer with so many requests that it is rendered inoperable. Basically the target computer becomes stupefied because it is unable to keep up with the incoming demand. We keep this from happening by keeping the firewall in place. The firewall only allows one computer to interact. This way the mind functions normally. We don't become confused with an overload of information. Incoming information is kept under control.
At the end of life the firewall opens up. It now allows all the IP on the Internet to go through. Every IP address can contact the computer.
Every IP address on the Internet is memory. When the firewall opens up, all the information that went into memory originally can now be contacted. All those computers that entered the firewall but were stopped can now get through. What we thought was full awareness was just one computer. Now that the firewall is open we realize there are billions more.
When this happens we will not experience a denial of service type avalanche of information. That is because the mind expands in kind. The mind becomes equivalent in size to all the IP address on the Internet. The mind, in its new expanded state, has a one-to-one relationship with all the IP addresses on the Internet. They are the same size.
This is a changing of dimension of the mind. In computer parlance, it is going from a single IP to all the IP addresses on the Internet. In terms of geometry, it is going from a single point in time and space to all of time and space. All of time and space, relative to the individual, is your memory. Your memory contains not only your surrounding space it also contains time. So when the mind expands it expands from a single point in time and space to all of time and space.
The mind expands from a fixed location in the universe, to the universe. That is how afterlife transcends time. One point becomes all space and time. Afterlife does not need duration in time. It is just one moment long. But inside that one moment is all time. Inside that one physical location is all space. The point in time and space where our life ends is the entry point to the kingdom of heaven. The kingdom of heaven is real. It exists.